PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
Invesco Golden Dragon China Portfolio seeks investment results that correspond to the price and yield of the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index. The index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered in China.
Emerging Market
EQUITY
Passive
MANAGEMENT STYLE
140.0 M
ASSETS UNDER MGMT
70 bp
EXPENSES
Fund Basics
| Fund sponsor | Invesco |
| Category | Emerging |
| Asset class | Equity |
| Website | link... |
| Inception date | Dec 09, 2004 |
| Assets (mns) | $140 |
| Expense ratio | 70 bp |
| Currency | USD |
Sector Breakdown
Fund Structure
| Regulation | Open-Ended Fund |
| Distributions | Quarterly |
| Taxation | 1099 |
| Stock selection | Depository Receipts |
| Weighting | Market Cap |
| Holdings Transparency | Full |
| Derivatives-based | No |
| Options available | Yes |
| Currency hedged | No |
| Fund of funds | No |
Top 10 Holdings
Complete list +
| YUM CHINA HOLDINGS, INC. | 7.7 % |
| JD.COM INC-ADR | 7.7 % |
| ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD. SPONSORED ADR | 7.6 % |
| NETEASE.COM INC-ADR | 6.9 % |
| BAIDU INC - SPON ADR | 6.3 % |
| TENCENT MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT GROUP ADR CL | 4.3 % |
| FULL TRUCK ALLIANCE CO LTD ADR | 3.8 % |
| KE HOLDINGS, INC. SPONSORED ADR CLASS A | 3.8 % |
| KANZHUN LTD. SPONSORED ADR | 3.5 % |
| VIPSHOP HOLDINGS LTD SPONSORED ADR | 3.4 % |
Constituent Breakdown
| Number of holdings | 50 |
| Herfindahl-Hirschman Index | 415 |
| Wgt avg mkt cap (mns) | $37,928 |
| Large cap (>$10bn) | 59.0% |
| Mid cap ($2-10bn) | 23.4% |
| Small cap (<$2bn) | 8.2% |
| Developed mkts. | 0.6% |
| Emerging mkts. | 88.4% |
Country Exposure
 |
CHINA | 88.2 % |
Historical Performance
Standardized Performance (as of 06/30/2025)
| YTD | 1 YR | 2 YR | 3 YR | 5 YR | 10 YR | 20 YR | Incep. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price Returns | 8.5% | 27.6% | 3.2% | -4.5% | -10.3% | -1.7% | 3.7% | 3.3% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.0% | 1.2% | 3.9% | 2.7% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Total Returns | 8.5% | 28.7% | 7.1% | -1.8% | -8.7% | -0.3% | 5.0% | 4.6% | Ann. Volatility | 35.8% | 38.2% | 34.4% | 39.2% | 44.9% | 37.1% | 35.2% | 34.8% |
Market Correlations
| versus... | Beta | R-squared |
| S&P 500 | 0.69 | 6% |
| MSCI EAFE | 1.40 | 26% |
| MSCI Emg Mkts | 2.26 | 70% |
Liquidity Measures
| Avg. volume (000) | 26 |
| ADV traded (mns) | $1 |
| Turnover | 0.5% |
| Avg. Bid/Ask (% of price) | 0.13% |
Technical Indicators
| Recent close | $28.51 |
| 30d moving avg. | $28.33 |
| Annualized volatility | 45.6% |
| Relative strength (RSI) | 52 |
| Short interest | 1.4% |
Distributions
Assets Under Management (mns)
Money Flows (mns)
Short Interest (as % of shares outstanding)
Long Money Flows (mns)
Top Ten Comparable ETFs only shown here. For an extended list become an Individual or Professional subscriber. Start your FREE trial
Comparable ETFs Based on Overlap
| Ticker | Fund Name | Overlap vs. |
Expenses vs. |
ALTAR Score™ vs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 21.2% | -1 bp | +26.4% |
| EBIZ | Global X E-Commerce ETF | 16.7% | -20 bp | +4.1% |
| SOCL | Global X Social Media ETF | 15.1% | -5 bp | +9.4% |
| CGRO | CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF | 11.4% | +5 bp | +4.9% |
Risk and Returns: vs. Comps (1 YR)
Notes: Top 10 overlapping ETFs. Funds with insufficient history not shown. Some funds may overlap. Hover over data point for ticker symbol.
Content on this tab for Individual & Professional subscribers only. Start your FREE trial
Results & Estimates
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales per share | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
| change (%) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
| Earnings per share | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
| change (%) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
| Dividends per share | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
| change (%) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
| Book value per share | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
| change (%) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Return on Equity
Net Margins
Content on this tab for Individual & Professional subscribers only. Start your FREE trial
Valuation Metrics
| Fwd Est | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
| Price-to-sales | --x | --x | --x | --x |
| Price-to-earnings | --x | --x | --x | --x |
| Price-to-cash flow | --x | --x | --x | --x |
| Price-to-growth | --x | --x | --x | --x |
| Price-to-book value | --x | --x | --x | --x |
| Yield | --% | --% | --x | --% |
Based on closing prices from 7/1/2025
Peer Group Comparison Sample data. Subscribe for access.
Price-to-Earnings
Price-to-Sales
Price-to-Book Value
Price-to-Cash Flow
Price-to-Growth
Dividend Yield
Historical Valuation Trends Sample data. Subscribe for access.
SHOWING:
Price-to-Earnings
Price-to-Earnings
Notes: Based on adjusted historical results for current fund constituents. May differ from results achieved by past fund constituents. Max P/E of 100x.
Some content on this tab for Individual & Professional subscribers only. Start your FREE trial
ETF Research Center Rating
SPECULATIVE
Deeply undervalued but risky. A rating of SPECULATIVE is assigned to ETFs with ALTAR Scores in the top quintile (the top 20%) of their category, indicating exceptional appreciation potential. However, often these are narrowly-focused funds or in industries with structural issues, which may also make them very risky. Nonetheless they may still be useful as part of a well-diversified portfolio.
ALTAR Score™
PGJ
13.0%
Cat. Avg
8.2%
ALTAR Score™ Calculation
Category Overview
There are 118 funds in the Emerging Equity category, with an average ALTAR Score™
of 8.2% and a standard deviation of
2.7%. PGJ's ALTAR Score™ is approximately
1.8 standard deviations
above
the category average. This places PGJ in the 96th percentile among funds in the category.
Sell Side Consensus Rating
Sell-side recommendations on the ETF's individual constituents
PGJSELL
U/W
HOLD
O/W
BUY
Expense Analysis
| Peer Group | Passive Emerging Market Equity ETFs |
| # of ETFs | 53 |
| Avg. Expense Ratio | 52.8 bp |
| Std. Deviation | 23.2 bp |
| (70 bp) Percentile rank | 78 |
Peer Group Expense Ratio Distribution
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Comparison
| Expense (bp) (A) |
Avg. Bid/Ask (bp) (B) |
TCO (bp) (A)+(B) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| PGJ | 70.0 | 0.0 | 70 |
| Peer Avg. | 55.9 | 19.8 | 75.7 |
For a detailed cost analysis of this and any other ETF use the TCO Comparison Tool .