{"id":332,"date":"2017-01-25T16:55:15","date_gmt":"2017-01-25T21:55:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.etfresearchcenter.com\/articles\/?p=332"},"modified":"2017-01-25T16:55:15","modified_gmt":"2017-01-25T21:55:15","slug":"has-smart-beta-stalled","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/2017\/01\/25\/has-smart-beta-stalled\/","title":{"rendered":"Has Smart Beta Stalled?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Market share\u00a0gains by “Smart Beta” ETFs appear to have all but stalled last year. By our calculations,\u00a0assets under management (AUM) grew by\u00a0just one\u00a0half of one\u00a0percentage point to 28.8% of all\u00a0equity ETFs, excluding\u00a0leveraged and inverse funds. Back at the end of 2010, smart beta funds had a market share of 18.3% of AUM (Figure 1).<\/p>\n

Our definition of smart beta is fairly expansive, including any funds that select constituents on fundamental- or momentum-based\u00a0metrics or proprietary methods, and\/or funds that weight constituents on any measure other than market cap or price. The largest smart beta fund under this definition is the $35 billion iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD<\/a>).Total assets for smart beta funds amounted to $572 billion as of December 31, 2016, compared to $1.4 trillion for standard beta funds (Figure 2).<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
Figure 1:\u00a0Smart Beta Market Share<\/span><\/strong>
\nas a %-age of all plain-vanilla equity ETFs<\/em><\/span><\/td>\n		<\/td>\nFigure 2:\u00a0Smart and Standard Beta AUM<\/span><\/strong>
\nin $billions, as of 12\/31\/16<\/em><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Source: AltaVista Research and FactSet<\/em><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/em><\/td>\nSource: AltaVista Research and FactSet<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

Does the stalled growth in market share mean that investors’ enthusiasm for smart beta ETFs\u00a0has peaked? We don’t necessarily think so, for several reasons.<\/p>\n

First, AUM growth was still robust in 2016 at 20.6% for smart beta ETFs; however standard beta funds saw AUM growth almost as good at 17.7%. Given the tidal wave of money<\/a> flowing into ETFs from active mutual funds last year it is understandable that much of it would first find its way into bellwethers like the S&P 500 SPDR (SPY<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Secondly, smart beta funds’ market share appeared to have stalled before, most recently in 2012. But in hindsight that was just a pause before considerable gains made in 2013, when some popular momentum funds such as the iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM<\/a>) were listed.<\/p>\n

Stock correlations were elevated most of last year while volatility remained low, an ideal environment for\u00a0low-cost standard beta ETFs\u00a0<\/q>Finally and perhaps most importantly, correlations between stocks remained elevated for most of last year\u2014falling significantly only since the election\u2014while volatility (Related ETP: iPath S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (VXX<\/a>))\u00a0remained exceptionally low. When most stocks rise and fall together, it is exceedingly difficult to generate alpha from stock selection or timing strategies employed by smart beta funds. In such an environment it makes sense to gain market exposure at the cheapest cost possible, and that means standard beta.<\/p>\n

But that environment may be changing. As mentioned, correlations between stocks have fallen significantly since the election, while certain sectors\u2014most notably the Financial Sector SPDR (XLF<\/a>)\u2014have taken a leadership role. And with plenty of policy uncertainty ahead, volatility has almost nowhere to go but up. We think investors may be wise to examine\u00a0how the right smart beta ETFs could benefit their portfolios.<\/p>\n

What kind of smart beta funds do you think will do well in 2017?<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Market share\u00a0gains by “Smart Beta” ETFs appear to have all but stalled last year. By our calculations,\u00a0assets under management (AUM) grew by\u00a0just one\u00a0half of one\u00a0percentage point to 28.8% of all\u00a0equity ETFs, excluding\u00a0leveraged and inverse funds. Back at the end of 2010, smart beta funds had a market share of 18.3% of AUM (Figure 1). Our…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":344,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[24],"tags":[56,58,4,57,9],"class_list":["post-332","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-smart-beta","tag-iwd","tag-mtum","tag-spy","tag-vxx","tag-xlf","description-off"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=332"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":353,"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332\/revisions\/353"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/344"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=332"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=332"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=332"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}