{"id":1577,"date":"2021-01-14T15:43:40","date_gmt":"2021-01-14T20:43:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/?p=1577"},"modified":"2021-01-26T13:40:54","modified_gmt":"2021-01-26T18:40:54","slug":"banned-chinese-companies-more-selling-to-come","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/2021\/01\/14\/banned-chinese-companies-more-selling-to-come\/","title":{"rendered":"Banned Chinese Companies: More Selling to Come?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"color:#10145e\" class=\"has-text-color has-background has-small-font-size has-very-light-gray-background-color\"><strong>NOTE: <\/strong>An earlier version of this article erroneously stated that China National Nuclear Power Co. (601985 CH) was an officially-designated Communist Chinese Military Company (&#8220;CCMC&#8221;). It is not. Its parent company, China National Nuclear Corporation, is an officially-designated CCMC. According to a recent Wall Street Journal article, subsidiaries like China National Nuclear Power Co. are set to be added to the CCMC list, but have not been yet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"color:#10145e\" class=\"has-text-color has-background has-small-font-size has-very-light-gray-background-color\"><strong>UPDATE: <\/strong>ETFs (and other investors) need only to divest from securities of firms officially designated as Communist Chinese Military Companies (&#8220;CCMC&#8221;) by the Treasury Department&#8217;s Office of Foreign Asset Control (&#8220;OFAC&#8221;) in order to be in compliance with Executive Order 13595. There is no obligation to divest from subsidiaries or affiliates of CCMCs unless and until such firm is officially designated as such by OFAC. <br><br><strong>The figures below are not meant to imply that any ETF is not in compliance with current OFAC guidance. <\/strong>Rather it is a screen of what <em>potential <\/em>exposure still exists IF subsidiaries and affiliates of CCMCs are in fact added to OFAC&#8217;s list, as the Treasury Department has stated it intends to do in <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"FAQ 857 (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/home.treasury.gov\/policy-issues\/financial-sanctions\/faqs\/857\" target=\"_blank\">FAQ 857<\/a>.  However, given the change in administration since publication of FAQ 857 on December 12, 2020, considerable uncertainty remains over future additions, if any, to OFAC&#8217;s list.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>President Trump&#8217;s recent Executive Order banning investment in companies designated as Communist Chinese Military Companies (&#8220;CCMC&#8221;)&#8211;including by ETFs&#8211;has spurred a wave of selling in stocks of those companies. Major index providers including S&amp;P Dow Jones, FTSE Russell and MSCI have already announced changes to affected indices, dropping many prominent companies including China Mobile (<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"941 HK (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/funds\/stocklocator.php?ticker=941-HK\" target=\"_blank\">941 HK<\/a>) and China National Offshore Oil, or CNOOC (<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"883 HK (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/funds\/stocklocator.php?ticker=883-HK\" target=\"_blank\">883 HK<\/a>), both of which were also recently delisted by the New York Stock Exchange as a result of the order.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ETFs that track affected indices have already sold most of the CCMCs, but our analysis of funds&#8217; holdings indicates that there could be more selling to come.  A recent <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/americans-wont-be-banned-from-investing-in-alibaba-tencent-and-baidu-11610563890\" target=\"_blank\">article<\/a> inWall Street Journal said that after much internal debate within the Trump administration, Chinese tech giants such as Alibaba (<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/funds\/stocklocator.php?ticker=BABA\" target=\"_blank\">BABA<\/a>), Baidu (<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/funds\/stocklocator.php?ticker=BIDU\" target=\"_blank\">BIDU<\/a>) and Tencent (<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/funds\/stocklocator.php?ticker=700-HK\" target=\"_blank\">700 HK<\/a>) would not be added to the list, but then added this stunning news, almost as an aside:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em><strong>&#8220;Nine other Chinese companies will be added, as well as more than 100 subsidiaries of companies already on the list&#8221;<\/strong><\/em>   <\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:50px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"color:#10145e\" class=\"has-text-color\"> <strong>Figure: Snippet from Wall Street Journal<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/WSJ_snip.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1623\" width=\"677\" height=\"226\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/WSJ_snip.png 903w, https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/WSJ_snip-300x100.png 300w, https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/WSJ_snip-768x256.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 677px) 100vw, 677px\" \/><figcaption>Wall Street Journal, Wednesday January 12, 2021.<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:50px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>The Department of State recently published a list containing both designated CCMCs as well as their Affiliates (and subsidiaries) that, though themselves not officially yet designated as such, would seem to fall under the scope of the president&#8217;s <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"Executive Order (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2020\/11\/17\/2020-25459\/addressing-the-threat-from-securities-investments-that-finance-communist-chinese-military-companies\" target=\"_blank\">Executive Order<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-pullquote is-style-default\"><blockquote class=\"has-text-color\" style=\"color:#10145e\"><p>178 ETFs still have exposure to CCMCs and their affiliates, and that list could grow<\/p><\/blockquote><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Including both officially-designated CCMCs as well as their publicly-listed Affiliates as per the State Department list, we found a total 178 ETFs still holding some potentially banned equities. Though most had only small exposure, there were some with considerably more. Below are the Top 10.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:50px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"color:#10145e\" class=\"has-text-color\"><strong>Table: Exposure to Potentially &#8220;Banned&#8221; Chinese Stocks<\/strong><br><em>Top 10 ETFs with Exposure to Communist Chinese Military Companies (CCMC) and their Publicly Traded Affiliates<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Ticker<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Fund Name<\/strong><\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-right\" data-align=\"right\"><strong>Weight<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/CHIU\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"CHIU (opens in a new tab)\">CHIU<\/a><\/td><td>Global X MSCI China Utilities<\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-right\" data-align=\"right\">16.1%<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/CHIE\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"CHIE (opens in a new tab)\">CHIE<\/a><\/td><td>Global X MSCI China Energy<\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-right\" data-align=\"right\">13.0%<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/CHIR\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"CHIR (opens in a new tab)\">CHIR<\/a><\/td><td> Global X MSCI China Real Estate<\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-right\" data-align=\"right\">9.6%<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/CHII\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"CHII (opens in a new tab)\">CHII<\/a><\/td><td> Global X MSCI China Industrials<\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-right\" data-align=\"right\">7.9%<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/FXI\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"FXI (opens in a new tab)\">FXI<\/a><\/td><td>iShares China Large-Cap ETF<\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-right\" data-align=\"right\">6.3%<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/KFVG\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"KFVG (opens in a new tab)\">KFVG<\/a><\/td><td>KraneShares CICC China 5G &amp; Semiconductor ETF<\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-right\" data-align=\"right\">5.9%<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/EMIF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"EMIF (opens in a new tab)\">EMIF<\/a><\/td><td>iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF<\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-right\" data-align=\"right\">4.8%<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/EDIV\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"EDIV (opens in a new tab)\">EDIV<\/a><\/td><td>SPDR S&amp;P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF<\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-right\" data-align=\"right\">4.7%<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/ECON\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"ECON (opens in a new tab)\">ECON<\/a><\/td><td>Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF<\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-right\" data-align=\"right\">3.9%<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/CHIK\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"CHIK (opens in a new tab)\">CHIK<\/a><\/td><td>Global X MSCI Information Technology ETF<\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-right\" data-align=\"right\">3.9%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-small-font-size has-very-dark-gray-color\"><em>Source: www.etfrc.com, FactSet and U.S. Department of State.<\/em> <em>Note: Constituents and weights as reported as of January 12, 2021.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:50px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\">Download the complete list:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-button aligncenter\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link has-background\" href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/archives\/CCMC_ETF_Exposure.xlsx\" style=\"background-color:#10145e\">DOWNLOAD (XLSX)<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\"><em>link expires after two months<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:40px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Four China sector funds from Global X occupy the top spots, not entirely surprising given that as sector funds they are more concentrated in single names than are most broad China funds. The Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF (<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"CHIU (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/CHIU\" target=\"_blank\">CHIU<\/a>) has the most, all three of which are Affiliates that could be added to the banned list. They are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>China Yangtze Power (<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"600900 CH (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/funds\/stocklocator.php?ticker=600900-CH\" target=\"_blank\">600900 CH<\/a>) &#8212; 8.3%<\/li><li>CGN Power Co., Ltd. (<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"1816 HK (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/funds\/stocklocator.php?ticker=1816-HK\" target=\"_blank\">1816 HK<\/a>) &#8212; 4.3%<\/li><li>China National Nuclear Power Co (<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"601986 CH (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/funds\/stocklocator.php?ticker=601986-CH\" target=\"_blank\">601985<\/a><a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/funds\/stocklocator.php?ticker=601985-CH\" target=\"_blank\"> CH<\/a>) &#8212; 3.5%<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>It is important to note that if and when a firm is added to the designated-CCMC list, investors (including ETFs) holding the newly banned entity have 60 days to comply, so that should mitigate the rush to sell that surrounded the publication of the first list following the executive order. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But we think the more important issue for ETF investors is to monitor how any changes&#8211;not just deletions but also their possible replacements&#8211;affect the fund&#8217;s overall fundamentals and investment outlook.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Of course the next administration could change the list or scrap it altogether, although we think the latter is unlikely. We will publish an update to our ETFs list if there are significant additions or deletions to the executive order in the coming weeks. Investors with any funds on the list should stay tuned!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We found 178 ETFs that still have some exposure to banned Communist Chinese Military Companies and their Affiliates.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1588,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[19,26],"tags":[251,223,257,252,250,256,255,254,226,253],"class_list":["post-1577","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-emerging-markets","category-stocks-in-the-news","tag-chie","tag-chii","tag-chik","tag-chir","tag-chiu","tag-econ","tag-ediv","tag-emif","tag-fxi","tag-kfvg","description-off"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1577","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1577"}],"version-history":[{"count":47,"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1577\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1631,"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1577\/revisions\/1631"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1588"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1577"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1577"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.etfrc.com\/articles\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1577"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}